With about 155,000 miles on my very clean 2008 BMW X3, my quandary appears to be shared as of late by many fellow car owners of a variety of brands. We find ourselves clinging to a long held daily driver with a passion normally saved for the family dog. Unfortunately we see this beloved vehicle getting quite long in the tooth.

I really like my X3. I mean, really. I have enjoyed multiple BMWs for decades. My E83 X3, sturdy and reliable at 18 years of age offers many appealing features no longer available on comparable contemporary BMW X3s or, for that matter, any other new X3 competitors like the M-B GLC, Audi Q5, Lexus Rx or Volvo XC60. As well, it delightfully lacks many features unavoidable in today’s high priced digitally infected offerings.

However unlike Rex the family dog, a treasured daily driver can have its life extended. In my case my goal would be to add another 50,000 miles of high quality driving. Refresh or replace my X3? That is the question explored in this Drivin’ News post.

Aging Beloved Daily Driver Quandary, Refresh or Replace?

The following paragraph comes with apologies to Julie Andrews: Knobs on my radio, buttons on dashes, shifting a 6-speed for lane changing passes, no need for oil of zero weight grade, this is how my favorite car would be made. Sadly none so equipped can be found anymore and that makes me feel so bad.

I purchased my 2008 X3 in 2017 from the original owner. It had 67,000 miles, a clean Carfax and all service records. It featured BMW’s acclaimed 3.0-liter 260 horsepower N52 naturally aspirated inline-6 coupled to a 6-speed ZF manual transmission. I can attest that my X3 translates the essence of the once renowned BMW driving experience into an SUV. To emphasize that point BMW embraced the descriptor SAV (Sports Activity Vehicle) to highlight the X3’s ability to fuse the practicality, space, and ruggedness of an SUV with the spirited performance, agile handling, and driver-focused feel of its signature sports sedans. BMW’s basing the 2008 X3 architecture on a 3-Series platform confirms that assessment. To quote Edmunds.com, “Given its very athletic personality, calling the 2008 BMW X3 the “3 Series of SUVs” wouldn’t be a stretch.” “Interestingly, of the 17,622 new 2008 X3s sold in America only a very small fraction came with the manual transmission found in mine. Today, locating a clean X3 with a manual transmission ranks as a rare and desirable find.

Considered the last of the legendary naturally aspirated inline-6 engines upon which BMW built its reputation, the N52 in my X3 with its inherently balanced inline-6 configuration, advanced features like Valvetronic, Double VANOS and lightweight magnesium-aluminum block boasts smooth, linear power and superior reliability compared to the more complex B48 turbocharged engine found in newer BMWs.

So, what shakes out when comparing the N52 against BMW’s B48 2.0-liter turbocharged engine introduced in the 2016 BMW X3 and continuing on today? One must consider that the Turbo B48 is quicker, more efficient and far easier to tune to a higher performance level. The downside comes with the complexity that can be associated with forced induction. For me the N52’s smooth, reliable and traditional feel when partnered with the robust ZF 6-speed known for its reliability and precise shifting suits my tastes and needs better. And, Oh yes, my X3 runs well on regular grade gasoline saving roughly one dollar per gallon at fill-up.

Compared to my X3, a new BMW X3 or any in its competitive set would provide for a far more modern vehicle and driving experience in terms of technology and sophistication. However, considering my preference for engagement and the associated simple pleasures enjoyed when behind the wheel when engaged, the character of the new X3 and the like might be off-target for my tastes.

Clearly among the automotive literati and traditional BMW enthusiasts, the 21st century has found voices expressing considerable concern that BMW has veered from the course set by the brand’s earlier classic models. These voices express a belief that BMW has abandoned its sporting heritage to emphasize an elevated level of luxury and advanced technology in an effort to appeal to a broader consumer base. Indeed such criticisms do resonate with me. Based solely on my driving preferences, the following concerns about the 2025 X3 actually make my 2008 more appealing. Keep in mind the very personal nature of my assessment. BMW by building cars to my tastes would most assuredly bankrupt the brand.

Engagement resides at the heart of the driving experience that defined BMW’s claim to being the Ultimate Driving Machine. Most obviously the new X3 does not come with a manual transmission. Indeed, the new X3’s mandatory electronic 8-speed automatic may shift quicker and smoother than my X3 with me at the controls. However, that absence of the third pedal, for me, succeeds in purging a richly tactile and rewarding enhanced driving experience. Another concern expressed by many focuses on BMW’s Standard electronic power steering (EPS) introduced in the 2014 model year. Though EPS enables seamless integration with driver aids like lane assist, custom steering modes and eliminates the need for hydraulic steering fluid, critics bemoan that it lacks the natural road feel and driver feedback considered a signature feature of the classic Ultimate Driving Machine. Other big problems exist as well.

For my needs the new X3 suffers from the common problem of “biggerness.” Like so many evolving brand models, each generation of X3s has grown. Compared to the 2008 X3 the 2025 X3 has grown 8 inches longer, 3 inches wider and 350 pounds heavier. Moving to the inside of the new X3’s tech-heavy interior one finds a passenger cabin replete with seemingly every application of advanced automotive digital interactive communications technology. While opening myself up to consideration as a borderline Luddite, I say for those who love a total immersion in tech; knock yourself out. For me, I prefer my dashboard to feature an analog interface rather than a sprawling IMAX screen. In scanning the new X3 dashboard, its 14.9-inch center iDrive9 infotainment display features a 12.3-inch fully digital gauge cluster. I find it demands my attention in the event I wish to change my heater setting or turn on the radio. And yes, I know to activate some new X3 functions I can talk to the car with the BMW Intelligent Personal Assistant. I have enough friends thank you. Wow, I am sounding a bit curmudgeonly I must confess. But, hey I just want a car I enjoy driving not a mobile video game.

Tactile friendly latching pushbuttons and knobs feature prominently on my list of dashboard actuators fondly recalled and absent in a new X3. For the latest X3, haptic, capacitance sensing, buttons rule the interface. On the steering wheel and across the center console these touch-sensitive surfaces deprive the driver of the satisfying tactile feedback of an intended action confirmed. While on the subject of cost cutting, road tests and customer feedback offer scathing criticism of the “cheap” and hard plastics employed throughout the interior. To boot, unlike my old X3 the new X3 no longer offers a sunroof that opens.

Other considerations impacting the Refresh or Replace decision include insurance and replacement cost. Presently, insuring my 2008 X3 cost $540 for a 6-month period. I do not have collision or comprehensive with the book value being roughly $2200. Maybe it goes for $5000 retail. With the cost of a low end new X3 30 with sales tax being well over $60,000, my insurance for the 6-month period with comprehensive and collision would be an estimated $2,737. This would make my new X3 insurance 500% of my present insurance or roughly $4,400 more per year. If you have an older car you like and it has good bones it does make you think. And I am thinking enough to move to the next step.

At this point in the Refresh or Replace decision process my honest evaluation of my X3 reveals problems associated with all of the classic 2008 X3 faults including: Valve cover gasket oil leaks, oil filter housing oil leaks and coolant system plastic parts failure. For more professional scrutiny, the next step calls for visiting my longtime trusted and respected BMW specialty shop. Here performance of a few basic tests will indicate the wisdom of pursuing the Refresh. In addition to a thorough visual inspection, a compression test will reveal the presence of any worn piston rings or leaky valves. A leak-down test will pinpoint with pressurized air the exact location of any power sapping engine problem. The compression test is a quick check to see if a cylinder’s compression is low while a leak-down test is more diagnostic, revealing the fault causing the low compression. Finally a smoke test injects smoke into a sealed engine intake system. Any escaping smoke pinpoints leaks from cracks, loose hoses, compromised vacuum lines or faulty gaskets.

So I stand poised at the precipice. With the goal of an additional 50,000 miles of high quality personal driving pleasure do I invest considerable dollars that I will never recoup whether sold or, God forbid, totaled? Clearly plowing money into a car with eighteen years and 155,000 miles on the clock will not address every component subject to failure. That said we are not talking a Chevy Vega here. This is the product of a proud design and manufacturing culture when it boasted products where 200,000 even 300,000 miles did not peg the exceptional performance needle. I am confident my 2008 BMW E83 X3 boasts the bones to be worthy of the effort. That assumes the preliminary inspection supports my confidence.

When they no longer make the car you love, does it make sense to love the car you have got. While the Beatles sang “Can’t buy me love,” applying to hearts, it may not hold true for cars. At least I intend to find out.

 

STAY TUNED IN THE COMING WEEKS FOR PART TWO “MAKING THE DECISION.”